Why I voted as I did planning meeting 20.07.15
Development: 14/0532 Land south of 24-46 Kings road et al
• Planners Recommendations: refuse
• Issues of Contention: this was refused in 2007, and nothing major has changed since then, would not comply with the NPPF
• How I voted: for refusal, unanimous
• Why: the paperwork argument is compelling
Development: 14/0594 Land North of Bedlam Bridge Road
• Planners Recommendations: refuse, most the above issues
• Issues of Contention: lots, residents believe we should be more strident in our objections
• How I voted: for refusal, 13-1
• Why: no reason not to, there was no compelling reason not to do this
Development: 14/0869 12 Streets Heath, West End, 60 bed care home
• Planners Recommendations: grant
• Issues of Contention: NIMBY, noise, residents don’t want any changes to their village, size
• How I voted: for, matter carried by 9-5
• Why: this is a much needed facility and if refused would have to be done on non-valid planning reasons, and would be overturned on appeal, as there was no realistic planning reason to deny this
Development: 15/0141 Weston Paddocks
• Planners Recommendations: grant
• Issues of Contention: none that we can see, access to the estate
• How I voted: for, unanimous
• Why: no reason not to, there was no compelling reason not to do this
Development: 15/0216 Unigate Dairies in Windlesham
• Planners Recommendations: grant based on drainage
• Issues of Contention: drainage
• How I voted: for, carried by 10-4
• Why: no reason not to, there was no compelling reason not to do this
Development: 15/0427 Chobham Meadows Land
• Planners Recommendations: grant
• Issues of Contention: no real ones, although some comments have been received
• How I voted: for, unanimous
• Why: no reason not to, there was no compelling reason not to do this, we need the SANG access
Development: 15/0033 Unit 2 Trafalgar Way
• Planners Recommendations: grant
• Issues of Contention: none
• How I voted: for, unanimous
• Why: no reason not to, there was no compelling reason not to do this
Development: 15/0504 87 Park Road
• Planners Recommendations: grant
• Issues of Contention: none
• How I voted: for, unanimous
• Why: no reason not to, there was no compelling reason not to do this