Why I voted as I did planning meeting 17.11.14

Development: 19 Queens Road Bisley

  • Planners Recommendations: approve based on agreements
  • Issues of Contention: entrance on Snowdrop Way is unacceptable, there were several residents speakers, most having to do with the access
  • How I voted: against, refused by 11-2
  • Why: in order to use the Queens Road access, the only thing necessary is a signature from the Secretary of State, which should not be an issue with the current endorsement of Michael Gove. So far, I have never seen an applicant be so disingenuous in making his case. His case entailed destroying the lives of all the people on Snowdrop way in Bisley, everyone saw his case for what it was…

Development Frimhurst Farm Development

  • Planners Recommendations: refuse
  • Issues of Contention: access points
  • How I voted: against, carried 9-3
  • Why: no reason to turn this down

Development: Brick Makers Arms, Chertsey Road, Windlesham

  • Planners Recommendations: refuse
  • Issues of Contention: retrospective
  • How I voted: for deferral, by11-1
  • Why: no reason not to, there was no compelling reason not to do this

Development Brook Green Waverley Close

  • Planners Recommendations: refuse
  • Issues of Contention: none
  • How I voted: for refusal
  • Why: no reason to have this

Development: Alenia Marconi Electricity Plant

  • Planners Recommendations: approval
  • Issues of Contention: noise, time of use
  • How I voted: against, carried by 9-2
  • Why: I am concerned about the noise and long term issues

Development: Burwood House and Hotel in Camberley

  • Planners Recommendations: defer and delegate to planners
  • Issues of Contention: none, breach of CP5 for affordable housing
  • How I voted: for, unanimous
  • Why: no reason not to, there was no compelling reason not to do this

Development: Pembroke House Pembroke Broadway

  • Planners Recommendations: defer and delegate to planners
  • Issues of Contention: none now, was with us before…
  • How I voted: for, unanimous
  • Why: no reason not to, there was no compelling reason not to do this

Development: 45 Deepcut Bridge Road

  • Planners Recommendations: Grant
  • Issues of Contention: none
  • How I voted: for, unanimous
  • Why: no reason not to, there was no compelling reason not to do this

Development: 29-29a Portesbery Road

  • Planners Recommendations: grant
  • Issues of Contention: none
  • How I voted: for, unanimous
  • Why: no reason not to, there was no compelling reason not to do this

Development: 22 Worsley Road

  • Planners Recommendations: refuse
  • Issues of Contention: none
  • How I voted: for refusal
  • Why: no reason not to, there was no compelling reason not to do this

Development the Sun Inn, 45 High Street Chobham

  • Planners Recommendations: grant
  • Issues of Contention: none, want them to use Heritage Lighting
  • How I voted: for, unanimous
  • Why: no reason not to, there was no compelling reason not to do this

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s