Why I voted as I did planning meeting 02.06.14

Development: Krooner Park and Crabtree Park football pitch development
Planners Recommendations: awas to approve, scaled back from previous application, but now that highways have objected, proposal to refuse now… Attempt made to defer, but overridden
Issues of Contention: highway safety from SCC has raised an objection, 400+ against it 500+ for it. Highways objection is so strong that it has changed the entire application
How I voted: support the officers to refuse. Matter refused by 13-2 with 1 objection
Why: highways objection was too compelling reason not to do this

Development: 8-9 Burgoyne Road
Planners Recommendations: approve
Issues of Contention: parking and noise fencing
How I voted: for approval
Why: no reason not to, there was no compelling reason not to do this, approved by 12-4

Development: Briar and Bramley Courts, Foxleigh Grange
Planners Recommendations: defer and delegate and grant
Issues of Contention: parking, development creep
How I voted: for
Why: no reason not to, there was no compelling reason not to do this,
approved by 15-1

Development: Electricity Substation in Bagshot
Planners Recommendations: grant approval
Issues of Contention: none
How I voted: for, matter approved by unanimous
Why: no reason not to, there was no compelling reason not to do this

Development: Unit 23 Nelson Way Camberley
Planners Recommendations: grant approval
Issues of Contention: at the end of Nelson Way in Yorktown Industrial estate
How I voted: for, approved by unanimous
Why: no reason not to, there was no compelling reason not to do this

Development: Faraway Snows Paddock in Windlesham
Planners Recommendations: refuse
Issues of Contention: too much development in the space of the property, and forward siting of the property
How I voted: for refusal, Unanimous
Why: just too much development on the site

Development: Teesdale, Westwood Road
Planners Recommendations: approve
Issues of Contention: none, for internal changes and listing
How I voted: for, unanimous
Why: no reason not to, there was no compelling reason not to do this

Development: The Manor, Southwell Park Road
Planners Recommendations: approve variation of planning condition
Issues of Contention: traffic and child inflation creep
How I voted: for but with review in 1 year, unanimous
Why: with the review in 1 year back to the planning committee

Development: Pennypot Cottage Pennypot Lane
Planners Recommendations: approve/grant
Issues of Contention: none
How I voted: for, unanimous on both counts
Why: no reason not to, there was no compelling reason not to do this

Development: 1 High Street Camberley
Planners Recommendations: grant
Issues of Contention: none, simple change of use
How I voted: for, unanimous
Why: no reason not to, there was no compelling reason not to do this

Development: Atrium external seating area
Planners Recommendations: approve
Issues of Contention: none
How I voted: for, unanimous
Why: no reason not to, there was no compelling reason not to do this

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s